The legal mandate of SRA is embodied in Executive Order No. 18  dated  May 28, 1986 creating the Sugar Regulatory Administration.  It states that the policy of the State is to promote the growth & development of the sugar industry through greater participation of the private sector and to improve the working conditions of the laborers.

RA 10659 or the Sugarcane Industry Development Act of 2015 further declares the policy of the State to promote the competitiveness of the sugarcane industry and maximize the utilization of sugarcane resources, and improve the incomes of farmers and farm workers, through improved productivity, product diversification, job generation, and increased efficiency of sugar mills.

RA 9367 or the Biofuels Act of 2006 mandated SRA as member of the National Biofuel Board (NBB) to develop and implement policies supporting the Philippine Biofuel Program and ensure bioethanol feedstock supply and security of domestic sugar supply.



“By 2040, the Philippines shall have a globally competitive sugarcane industry that supports the food, power, and other related industries through an institutionally competent SRA and committed stakeholders, for a secured future for Filipinos.”



“SRA is a Government Owned and Controlled Corporation which formulates responsive development and regulatory policies, and provides RD & E services to ensure sufficient supply of sugarcane for a diversified, sustainable and competitive industry that improves productivity and profitability of sugarcane farmers and processing industries, and provides decent income for workers towards enhancing the quality of life of Filipinos.”






SRA is committed to promote the advancement and competitiveness of the sugarcane industry amidst global challenges. It shall continue to improve the way it does its business, in an effort to meet the expectations of its clientele while maintaining compliance, to applicable legal requirements. It shall ensure the continual improvement of its human resource capabilities, as response to the current and strategic needs of the industry”.  



The Sugar  Regulatory Administration (SRA) was created by virtue of Executive Order No. 18 dated May 28, 1986.  E.O. No. 18 was promulgated during the Freedom Constitution or Proclamation No. 3 dated March 25, 1986 by President Corazon C. Aquino which recognized the sugar industry as a major component of the socio-economic and political structure of the country.  It also reiterates that in order to protect the national interest, free market forces should be allowed to prevail in the marketing of sugar although the production of the same should be regulated and supported with an innovative research and development program and a socio-economic program which will be primarily be the private sector’s responsibility.



Further Reading:


View Executive Order No. 18

Executive Order No. 18

Creating the Sugar Regulatory Administration

Organizational Chart

Organizational Chart

Functional Statements

Corporate Objectives

Corporate Objectives



  1. Pro-active and effective policies and regulations to ensure viability, food safety, environmental sustainability and global competitiveness of the sugarcane industry;
  2. Product diversification, development and promotion;
  3. Responsive technical assistance and extension services to sugarcane industry stakeholders;
  4. Environment-friendly and innovative R&D technologies for the sugarcane industry stakeholders
  5. Sustained development of expertise and human resources in the field of sugarcane industry development and related areas;
  6. Empowered SRA supportive of its Vision, Mission and Goals.


  1. To recommend the establishment of a sugar production coefficient and a production quota which shall be attached to the land for each planter;
  2. To institute regulations for implementing, controlling and monitoring the production quotas;
  3. To establish domestic, export and reserve allocations;
  4. To explore and expand the domestic market and foreign markets for sugar and by-products, to assure mutual benefits to consumers and producers and to promote and maintain a proper balance of production of sugar and its by-products;
  5. To institute, implement and regulate an orderly system of quedanning, disposition and withdrawals of various forms of sugar from warehouse;
  6. To evaluate and recommend to the President new projects involving the production of sugar and its by-products and other products derived from sugarcane and sugar;
  7. To issue permits and licenses and collect corresponding fees and levies on the processing and manufacture of sugar and its by-products and other products derived from sugarcane and sugar;
  8. To enter, make and execute routinary contracts as may be necessary for or incidental to the attainment of its purposes between any persons, firm, public or private, and the Government of the Philippines;
  9. To do all such other things, transact such other businesses and perform such function directly or indirectly necessary, incidental or conducive to the attainment of the purposes of the Sugar Regulatory Administration.



1. Industry Safeguards

  • Formulation of production allocation / market distribution, import and export policies;
  • Enforcement of policies on the regulation and monitoring of imported high fructose corn syrup (HFCS),
  • Generation of digitized mill district maps,  installation of automated weather stations and use of drone technology and crop modelling information systems in crop estimation and monitoring;
  • Registration of sugarcane farmers, farmers’ associations/ federations, mills and mill associations, sugarcane consolidators, muscovado producers, distilleries using molasses, sugar or sugarcane, international and domestic sugar traders, wholesalers and repackers of sugar,   muscovado and molasses traders, and CBW food processors who are importing sugar for re-export;
  • Formulation of policies to strengthen sugar anti-smuggling through  private sector participation, LGU cooperation and improved Sugar Movement Monitoring;
  • Accurate physical inventory of sugar stocks and audit of sugar quedans through e-quedan tracking system;
  • Monitoring of production, withdrawals, coastwise shipments and prices of sugar;
  • Technical audit/ assessment and environmental monitoring of sugar mills and refineries;
  • Farm audits and assessment of production costs and price structure of sugar;
  • Quality assurance of raw sugar, refined sugar and muscovado;
  • Issuance of food safety regulations such as, Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) certifications and import permits.

2. Increase in Sugar Production, Farm Productivity and Income of Farmers

  • Monitoring and evaluation of the Programs on Block Farm, Farm Mechanization and other farm support programs like socialized credit, technical assistance, farm management and planning;
  • Cost-efficient production technologies and practices through a more focused research, development, extension and production support services in collaboration with PHILSURIN, UPLB, PCAARRD, BAR and other State Universities and Colleges;
  • Strengthening and expanding the SRA breeding program in order to produce good ratooning, disease-resistant, high sucrose, high biomass content and climate resilient high yielding cane varieties through partnership  with UPLB and PHILSURIN;
  • Rapid propagation of sugarcane High Yielding Varieties (HYVs) in all sugarcane mill districts through the establishment of high-yielding variety nurseries and demo farms;
  • Aggressive research and development  program for a more competitive sugarcane industry  through:
    • Study on the effect of different soil ameliorants in the improvement of soil condition and yield of sugarcane farms in Tarlac Mill District;
    • Mudpress for soil fertility and productivity;
    • Project on productivity improvement through dethrashing and propping practices in Pensumil Mill District;
    • Detailed study on the effects of eco-adaptive nutrients to boost sugarcane farm productivity;
    • Developing strategies and technologies to increase sugarcane yield in Cagayan Valley;
    • Adaptability trials of newly released sugarcane genotyped varieties;
    • Integrated crop management for increased sugarcane productivity;
    • Integrated pest management in sugarcane farming;
    • Study on the response of HYVs to furrow distance in Davao Mill District;
    • Study on the comparative performance of HYVs and different brands of fertilizers in Davao Mill Districts;
    • Evaluation of greenhouse gas emission (GHG) of the activities in sugarcane farming and sugar production;
    • Continuing development of Site-specific Soil Management and Fertilizer Requirement Guide;
    • Enhancing sugarcane varieties for prolonged ratooning, productivity and profitability;
    • Study/ demonstration on production of biogas from filtercake and other sugarcane materials;
  • Product and by-product development for sugarcane
  • Productivity  improvement from 59 TC/Ha to 70 TC/Ha  (crop year 2013-2014  to  2019-2020); Sugar yield from 1.96 LKG/TC to 2.0 LKG/TC  and increase of small farmers income by a minimum of P20,000 per hectare or improve their competitiveness and ensure sustainability of their livelihood;
  • Crop financing through the socialized credit under RA 10659 and Public-Private Partnership (PPP);
  • Development and promotion of sugarcane-based industries such as muscovado, bioethanol and power co-generation while maintaining sugar self-sufficiency;
  • Improve capacity utilization of existing sugar mills and to partially supply the feedstock of the mandated requirement of bioethanol pursuant to R.A. 9367 through intensification or farm productivity improvement.

3.  Welfare of Sugarcane Farmers and Workers

  • Development of training regulations and qualifications to upgrade the skills of sugarcane farmers and workers;
  • Conduct of Outreach Programs and capability building programs such as farm-based trainings on cost-efficient practices in sugarcane farming, technical trainings on fertilizer usage and application, advisory services, on-site trainings, farm visits, etc.;
  • Capability building of farmers in farm/block farm management, financial management, human resource management etc.;
  • Conduct of training needs assessment on disaster risk reduction management for the sugarcane industry
  • Scholarship program for the children and dependents of small sugarcane farmers and workers to generate the expertise needed for industry development;
  • Study on the effect of service providers to sugarcane block farms in Silay City;
  • Collection of liens through sugar quedans to fund for the socio-economic needs of the sugarcane industry’s dependents implemented by the Sugar Industry Foundation, Inc. (SIFI);
  • Enforcement of lien collection through sugar quedans for the Social Amelioration Program (SAP) of sugar workers implemented by DOLE;
  • Bilateral arrangements with progressive sugarcane- producing countries and linkaging with international organizations;
  • Convergence initiatives with DAR, DA, DOLE, DepEd, DSWD, DPWH, DTI, NEDA, DOE etc. for the farmers and workers welfare and rehabilitation of  calamity stricken  and vulnerable areas.

4. Policy Support for the Philippine Sugarcane Industry 

  • Formulation of policies for general safeguards and measures against the surge of imported sugar and sugar substitutes;
  • Formulation of policy for disaster risk reduction management for the sugarcane industry;
  • Enhancing the capacity and disaster preparedness of sugarcane mill districts;
  • Biofuel production policies for feedstock producers, feedstock traders and bioethanol producers;
  • Formulation of policy on the use of sugarcane syrup for bioethanol production;
  • Updating of the Sugar and Ethanol Blackbook.

5. Development of Infrastructure Facilities 

  • Evaluation of the benefits of core samplers in selected sugar mills;
  • Upgrading of the soils laboratory of Mindanao MDDCs;
  • Construction of irrigation and water impounding infrastructures in sugarcane areas;
  • Construction/rehabilitation of farm-to-mill roads and bridges in the sugarcane mill districts.

6.  Public Relations and Industry Communication Program 

  • Conduct of Mill District Development Council (MDDC) Summit, Sugar Summit and Stakeholders’ general assembly;
  • Conduct of sugar fora,  public consultations, focus group discussions, stakeholders meetings and press conferences;
  • Publication of industry statistics, circularization / posting of sugar policies and guidelines, industry initiatives / updates and other relevant information in the SRA website;
  • Participation in international sugar and bioenergy conferences, seminars, workshops.

7.  Promotion of Good Governance and Transparency in Public Service 

  • Establishment of a monitoring and evaluation system and geotagging of the status of all projects implemented for the sugarcane industry;
  • Updating of the SRA transparency seal, service guide and compliance to the requirements of the anti-red tape law (ARTA);
  • Continuing performance assessment of  and disciplinary actions to frontline personnel providing regulatory services;
  • Dissemination of SRA policies and industry updates such as circularization/posting of sugar policies and guidelines, industry statistics/initiatives and other relevant information in the SRA website;
  • Strict adherence to the Freedom of Information (FOI) law;
  • Improvement of SRA services specifically on matters concerning R&D, report automation, e-quedan systems, personnel development program, organizational enhancement and crop estimation improvement;
  • Implementation of the “No Gift Policy” Quality Management System and SRA Manual of Corporate Governance







The sugar industry of the Philippines has had a colorful and dramatic history. The industry started some two to four thousand years before the Christian era where vessels from the Celebes brought sugarcane cuttings to Mindanao.  Eventually, these plants spread further north to the Visayan islands and Luzon, such that by the time of the European contact with the archipelago early in the sixteenth century, sugarcane plants could be found in various localities where the soil was tilled by the native inhabitants.

By the time Ferdinand Magellan, a Spaniard who discovered the islands, reached the Philippines in 1521, the cultivation of sugarcane was widespread in many of the islands. The extraction of juice for the cane was done in a primitive manner, that is, by the pressure exerted by hand or foot-operated lever on a wooden stationary surface. The use of wooden rolls, two in a vertical position came later. The substitution of stone cylinders came after the influx of Chinese emigrants to the islands during the first decades of the Spanish occupation. Carabaos and water buffalos supplied the motion power for these crude extractors in the Philippines up to the nineteenth century. The pressing of the cane is performed by means of two coarse stone cylinders placed on the ground and moved in opposite directions by the slow and unequal pace of a carabao. The juice is conveyed to an iron cauldron containing clay and in this the other operations of bottling, skimming and cleaning take place till the crystallization is completed. The boiled sugarcane juice near crystallization is poured into a setting clay jar called pilon which has a hook at the bottom through which excess molasses pass on to a smaller jar.

The arrival of the Spaniards in Manila in 1572 and the increase in their numbers because the city was made the capital of the Islands resulted in the shortage of rice, sugar and other foodstuffs. Chinese traders, always sensitive to commercial trends, began importing these items to remedy the shortages.

Meanwhile, sugarcane was planted in large numbers in nearby areas such as Bulacan, Pampanga and Laguna. Sugar was so sought after that in a valley between two mountains in northeastern Pangasinan, the area was devoted to the cultivation of sugarcane.  The Visayan islands kept pace with this development. By the middle of the seventeenth century, practically every region of the archipelago had small plantations devoted to sugarcane. Primitive mill for the manufacture of muscovado and molasses numbered by the scores such that one may buy 25 pounds of sugar for one teston (a Spanish silver coin with the sovereign’s head on one side and equivalent in value to the English sixpence).

By the middle of the next century, in the 1750’s, enough sugar was produced locally to enable the exportation of modest amounts. Prior to that time, the exportation of sugar was prohibited according to an Englishman by the name of Nicolas Norton Nicols. But as there was enough sugar to meet domestic consumption, and as there existed a foreign market for the item, the Philippines started to export sugar to China and other Asian countries by 1755.

After the British occupation of the Islands in 1764, the amount of sugar exports gradually increased. The establishment of the Royal Company of the Philippines in 1785 fomented trade in general and in the following year the company exported 860 arrobas to Spain. Ten times this amount was sent to India and China in 1788. In 1789, it was reported that the Island has exported 40 to 50,000 piculs or from 2000 to 3500 short tons. During the period 1775 to 1779, the Philippines was the largest exporter of sugar in all Asia.

The Port of Manila was gradually opened to ships of all nations starting in 1785 doing away with the monopolistic restrictions spawned by the galleon trade. At the beginning, only Asian goods in Asian ships could be brought in. Four years later, at the petition of the Royal Company, a royal decree legally opened Manila to non-Asian shipping.  By 1796, the SS Astrea of Salem docked in Manila whence all restriction had been lifted. This was the start of sugar trade between the Philippines and the United States.

The opening of the Port of Manila during the later part of the 18th century triggered progress in Philippine trade with other foreign countries. Historical records on trading include sugar, hemp, indigo, rum, spices, animal hides, etc. In so far as he sugar industry is concerned this precipitated the growth and further development of the sugar industry. Aside from the raising of indigo, coffee and cotton, sugarcane cultivation received attention of those planters who not only took better care in tilling their fields but also introduced modern methods in the extraction of the sugar from the cane. The foremost of these plantations in the island of Luzon were those of Inigo de Azaola, A Spaniard, M. Vidie, a Frenchman and Domingo Roxas, a Creole located in the environs of Laguna province. These three planters hired the service of a Frenchman named Delaunay who had experience in sugar mills in the French colony of Mauritius to supervise the construction of boilers and sugar mills. The smaller sugarcane farmers in the neighboring provinces of Bulacan, Pampanga and Pangasinan immediately copied the method of the larger haciendas. When Roxas bought the  Calatagan estate in 1837 he obtained the services of German Gaston, another French expert to supervise the planting of sugarcane and the construction of a mill in Batangas. The success of the endeavor was fruitfully realized when the Roxas family acquired the Lian and Nasugbu estates further north. A mill established in this area later became known as Central Azucarera de Don Pedro. Gaston emigrated to Panay where he became one of the pioneers of the sugar industry in the Visayan Islands.

Although sugarcane was raised since pre-Spanish times in the Visayan islands  after its introduction, it did not become much of an industry until after 1850. There were a score of small plantation in the province of Iloilo and a few in Negros that cultivated the Saccharum officinarum but the output was for regional consumption and anything over a few thousand piculs were sent to Manila for the foreign market. Then came Nicolas Loney, Britanic Majesty’s Vice-Consul to Iloilo in 1856 who acted as the catalyst that skyrocketed the sugar industry of the region to unprecedented heights. Through his firm of Loney and Kee Co., he supplied most of the capital for sugarcane growing. He convinced the American house of Russell and Skurgis to open a branch in Iloilo for the purpose of giving crop loans to sugar planters. He imported sugarcane cuttings from Sumatra and  brought machinery from England and Scotland which the sugar planters could buy on easy installments. Then he built a stone warehouse in Iloilo later to become an imposing wharf which inhabitants called Muelle Loney in his honor. To transport sugar from Negros, he built at Buenavista in Guimaras Island sailing crafts called Lorchas patterned after Brixham Trawlers of Downshire used for deep-sea fishing in the English channel. The transformation of the swampy ground along the strait between the town and the Island of Guimaras into a wharf were the interisland vessels and even ocean-going ships could lie alongside made Iloilo a port of call and turned it eventually into the business seaport on the archipelago next to Manila. Meanwhile, prices of sugar in the world market kept rising in 1857. He arranged for two British Brigs, the SS Pet and The SS Camilla to call at the Port of Iloilo to load several thousand piculs of his sugar to Melbourne, Australia where the Victoria Sugar Co. was avidly waiting for them. The other British colony, New Zealand, was also a good market for unrefined sugar.

Foreseeing the great future for the sugar industry in the Visayas, Loney decided to develop adjoining Negros Islands as a source of this product by offering the same liberal terms to the few Negrense planters as those he had given the Ilonggo landowners. This started the exodus of Iloilo planters to Negros in 1857, for land values in the formers had increased while in the latter province, virgin areas could be had cheaply. Thus, prominent families from Jaro, Molo and Miegao emigrated to Negros such as Simeon Ledesma to Silay, Lucio Lacson to Minuluan, Cornelio Hilado to the Hacienda Bagacay and Matabang, the Cosculluelas, Perez, Alvarez, Sotamayor and Escanilla families to Guinigaran and Himamaylan. The municipalities of Saravia and Escalante were also opened to the sugar pioneers. The Visayan island produced mainly raw sugar exported to the United States, England and Australian while in Manila, crystal grain sugar was exported to Spain.

Consequently, in Luzon a better class of machinery was used. In 1890, five haciendas had vacuum pans installed in their mills while one refinery was constructed in Malabon. In 1885, the government also acquired a vacuum pan for the San Ramon penal colony where a pilot sugar plant had been built. Almost all of the sugar mills in Negros used European machinery while every other sugar-producing province roughly made vertical mills of wood or stone (wood in the south and stone in the north) as introduced by the Chinese centuries earlier. The outbreak of the Philippine revolution against Spain in 1896 did no affect to any great extent the agricultural products exported by the Philippines. However, the Philippine-American War of 1899-1901 covered a larger theater of conflict and the fighting followed wreaked havoc on the countryside. All of Luzon, Cebu, Panay, Negros and parts of Mindanao were included in the devastation. Sugar production dropped considerably. The sugar industry did not recover from the ill effects of the war until peace and order was restored in 1902 and not until 1913 did it reach the level of its exports during the last years of the Spanish regime.

The development of the Philippine sugar industry prospered and was encouraged during the American occupation of the country by allowing the Philippines to export sugar to the United States under preferential terms.

It will be recalled however, that the U.S. became a market for the Philippine sugar as early as 1796.  From 1880 to 1889 sugar exports to the U.S. averaged approximately 200,000 metric tons annually. Then, as now the U.S. has become the country’s principal export market.

In 1902, by an act of Congress, the U.S. admitted entry of the Philippine sugar, paying only 75% of the duty or 1.685 cents per pound.

In 1909, the U.S. Congress passed the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act. This law established a limited free trade arrangements between the U.S. and the Philippines. Under this free trade arrangements, 300,000 tons of sugar can be admitted to the U.S. free of duty.

In 1913, the U.S. Congress enacted the Underwood-Simmons Tariff Law which removed the quantitative limitation on duty-free products of the Philippines entering the U.S.

Under this stimulus, the Philippine sugar industry developed and expanded. Forty seven (47) mills were established before the last world war. Production rose by 502% from 206,000 tons in the 1912-1913 crop year to an all time high of 1,565,405 tons for 1933-1934.

Before the passage of the Jones Costigan Act in 1933, the Continental U.S. imported 1,249,000 tons of Philippine sugar. At about the same time, our domestic consumption needs were barely 90,000 tons. As a result of the restrictive U.S. sugar programs of the late 1930’s, imports for the Philippines were cut down to 1,088,000 tons in 1934 and were held at 980,000 tons under the then existing U.S. sugar laws. This remained to be so until the outbreak of World War II.

The Philippine legislature for its part approved the Sugar Limitation Law (Act No. 4166) which limited our sugar production to the then existing quotas – 90,000 short tons for domestic consumption and 980,000 short tons raw value for export to the United States. Executive Order No. 900 provided for the system of allotting these national quotas, on the basis of the production coefficients arrive at after an audit of the industry.

During the last World War II, the sugar industry was destroyed. When the war ended, the Philippine sugar industry started to reconstruct itself. Of the 47 mills existing before the war, only 25 were completely rehabilitated.

Under the Philippine Trade Act of 1946 extended up to 1974 by the Laurel-Langley Agreement, the Philippine basic quota of sugar for export to the U.S. was maintained at 980,000 short tons, raw value or 952,000 short tons commercial weight.

In 1956, when amendments were introduced into the 1948 U.S. Sugar Act, the Philippines did not get any increase. The first break came in 1960. Under several amendments to the U.S. Sugar Act, the Philippines received quota increases in the form of non-quota purchases. In 1962, a basic quota increase of 70,000 short tons plus the right to participate in shortfalls and the global quotas, in a “first-come first-served” basis was given to the Philippines.

The culmination of the long campaign for increased quotas came in 1965 under the 1965 U.S. Sugar Act amendments which provide for the following:

1) A basic quota of 1,050,000 short tons plus 10.86% of any U.S. consumption increase from 9.7 million to 10.4 million tons or a total basic quota of 1,126,000 short tons for the Philippines;

2) 47.22% of the deficits of U.S. domestic producers and other foreign country suppliers which conservatively is estimated to be about 200,000 tons, shall be allotted to the Philippines;

3) The encouragement, if not a requirement that the Philippines maintain in reserve the equivalent of 15% of her U.S. quotas or roughly 180,000 tons;

4) The premium recapture fee and a quarterly system of allocation during the first semester of each calendar year.

After the approval of the U.S. Sugar Act Amendments of 1965, the expansion program of the Philippine sugar industry moved forward rapidly on a scale to ensure fulfillment of Philippine consumption and U.S. import requirements and the necessary reserves even under uncertain weather conditions that have been experienced by the industry so far. Under the expansion program, total mill capacity more than doubled from 76,991 metric tons of cane daily for 24 sugar centrals in crop year 1960-61 to 150,264 tons for 36 sugar centrals in crop year 1971-72. The expansion program yielded its initial results in crop year 1972-73 with the record crop of 2.3 million short tons commercial weight from 37 sugar mills. In 1974-75 crop year, the total yield from 38 sugar mills increased to 2.396 million metric tons sugar. The last of the 42 sugar mills started operating in crop year 1978-79 increasing the total mill capacity to 188,770 tons cane per day.

Under the Sugar Act Amendments of 1971, the Philippines has been given a basic quota of 1,126,020 tons and sets the nation’s share of deficit at a level (30.08 per cent) that will give the Philippines a quota of 1,314,020 tons. As of 1973, the Philippines’ total quotas and prorations of 1,347,591 shot tons are more than double than that of the Dominican Republic which is the second largest sugar supplier to the U.S. The Philippines continued to have the lion’s share of the foreign sugar requirements of the U.S. until the expiration of the U.DS. Sugar Act and the termination of the Laurel-Langley Agreement in 1974. This placed the Philippines in the highly competitive and volatile world free market. The euphoria of the good world prices in 1974-75 was short-lived as prices dropped form a high of U.S. 65 cents per pound in 1975 to only 6 cents per pound in 1977.

In 1977, the country had an oversupply of sugar. With the price down, there were no buyers. While white stocks were deteriorating, new crops were waiting to be harvested. As a consequence, there were no lenders to the sugar industry as traditional bankers cut back on sugar loans to protect their investment. Planters could not pay their loans. Workers could not be paid. The sugar industry was in the verge of collapse. Decisive measures were needed to save the industry.

In July 1977, President Marcos ordered the activation of the Philippine Sugar Commission (PHILSUCOM) to act as policy-formulating body and to oversee and coordinate various industry activities. A few months later, the National Sugar Trading Corporation (NASUTRA) was organized as the country’s single buying/trading agency finally forming the ranks of 70 other countries employing the single trading agency concept. And to complete the rationalization of the sugar industry, the Republic Planters Bank came into being in May 1978. It was tasked with the role of providing adequate and timely financing to the sugar industry. These organizations immediately worked to resuscitate the sugar industry. Buyers for Philippine sugar like U.S.S.R., South Korea, China, Japan, Malaysia, and Sri Lanka, among others were found. Within six months, warehouses were decongested with the shipment of over one million tons of sugar.

With the lessons of the 1975-77 sugar crisis in mind, the PHILSUCOM established a protective pricing policy to minimize the impact of wildly fluctuating world sugar prices. The Philippines entered into a four-year long terms contracts to sell 50 per cent of our export sugar at an average of U.S. 23.5 cents per pound when prevailing world prices were then above 30 cents per pound. The objective is to assure producers of a reasonable return in investment by partially insulating them from wild world market price fluctuations while allowing for flexibility to take advantage of occasionally high world prices.

These long-term contracts assured the country a steady source of foreign exchange earnings ranging from 4.72 to 16.31% of the country’s total export earnings and the producers a remunerative price even as sugar producers in other countries without the benefit of long-term contacts suffered financially. This future contract did not benefit majority of the sugar planters.

During the interregnum while the long-term contracts were operating, producers realized that (a) prices in the world market was not at all improving, (b) our quota to the U.S. under the quota system was limited to 342,900 short tons raw value, (c) in the U.S. alone, sugar displacement estimates due to high fructose corn syrup usage from 500,000 to 600,000 tons on an annual basis and (d) domestic sugar prices are starting to go down.

At this point, some sectors in the sugar industry started agitation for free enterprise and through vigorous demonstrations led by the New Alliance of Sugar Producers, Presidential Decree No. 1905 was issued February 1984 placing the sugar trading under free enterprise.

In August 31, 1984 through the representation of some producers, the postponement of the effectivity of free trading was granted under P.D. 1918.

Subsequently, through the representation of the Philippine Sugar Association, export sugar trading was returned to NASUTRA by virtue of P.D. 1939 (June 29, 1984)

In the meantime, world sugar prices kept going down even below 2.7 cents per pound equivalent to around P 72 per picul at the current rate of exchange. The situation has been aggravated by the credit restrictions of the Central Bank which adversely affected crop loan financing and the carrying cost of sugar inventories.

In February 21, 1985, President Marcos issued P.D. 1971, revitalizing the Philippine Sugar Industry and reorganizing the Philippine Sugar Commission. In furtherance of the purposes and objectives of this decree, the Commission shall cause the conversion of the National Sugar Trading Corporation (NASUTRA) into a private corporation to be called the Philippine Sugar Marketing Corporation (PHILSUMA) not later than December 31, 1985. By virtue of P.D. 1984 (August 31, 1985), PHILSUMA which will be the sole marketing agency for exporting sugar will be owned 100% by the sugar producers in proportion to their actual production.

While PHILSUCOM was at the height of rationalizing the sugar industry pursuant to P.D. 1971, a political revolution broke out from February 22 to 25, 1986. On February 27, 1986, Mr. Fred J. Elizalde was appointed by the revolutionary government as Officer-in-Charge of the institutions that will regulate the sugar industry. A sugar advisory council consisting of 42 sugar industry leaders from all over the country was constituted and was instructed by the President to lay out the plans for the interest of the sugar industry. On May 28, 1986, President Corazon C. Aquino through Executive Order No. 18, created a Sugar Regulatory Administration (SRA). The objectives assigned this Office are as follows:

1) To institute an orderly system in sugarcane production for the stable, sufficient and balanced production of sugar for local consumption, exportation and strategic reserve;

2) To establish and maintain such balanced relation between production and requirement of sugar and such marketing conditions as will insure stabilized prices at a level reasonably profitable to producer and fair to consumers;

3) To promote the effective merchandising of sugar and its products in the domestic and foreign markets so that those engaged in the sugar industry will be placed on a basis of economic viability;

4) To undertake such relevant studies as may be needed in the formulation of policies and in the planning and implementation of action programs required in attaining the purposes and objectives set forth under Executive Order No. 18.

The first members of the Board of the Sugar Regulatory Administration for the term 1986 to 1989 were:

Atty. Arsenio B. Yulo, Jr.  –   Chairman
Mr. Carlos Ledesma        –   Member
Mr. Bibiano Sabino          –   Member

Immediately after assumption to office, these officials promulgated the following policy guidelines:

1) Sanctity of the quedan – No sugar shall be withdrawn from any warehouse without a quedan.

2) Free enterprise system – Any sugar producer can sell his/her sugar to anybody at any time subject only to government regulations.

3) Quota allocation – Production quotas attached to the land shall be assigned on the basis of national target production.

4) Research and development – Efforts towards research and delivery of extension services shall be revitalized. The utilization of sugar and sugar by-products shall be given more emphasis.

5) Social concerns – The alleviation of the living conditions of producers and sugarcane workers in their respective communities shall be the concern of SRA.

6) Rationalization of production capabilities – Efficient utilization of mills with respect to their milling capacities shall be critically evaluated.

7) Enhancement of domestic market – Efforts towards increasing local market demand is envisaged through the establishment of a more efficient sugar distribution network, campaign for more direct uses of sugar, massive information dissemination on the use of sugar and a more effective transport system.

8) Payment of proceeds of the 1984-85 crop which was not paid by the defunct National Sugar Trading Corporation (NASUTRA).

9) Sale of the Republic Planters Bank.

10)Development of export market, especially the United States.

In June 1989, the terms of the two board member expired. They were replaced accordingly.

For the term 1989 to 1992, the Board members were:

Atty. Arsenio B. Yulo,  Jr.   –    Chairman
Mr. Jose Ma. T. Zabaleta   –    Member
Atty. Rodolfo A. Gamboa    –    Member

Executive Order No. 631 dated July 9, 2007 declared SRA as a Government Owned and Controlled Corporation (GOCC).  The Administrative Code of 1987 provides that SRA is an attached unit of the Department of Agriculture but shall continue to operate and function in accordance with its charter.  Furthermore, it provides that the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture shall serve as Chairman of the governing board of SRA.  Upon the promulgation of the Administrative Code of 1987, Atty. Arsenio B. Yulo, Jr. who was discharging the duties as Chairman of the Sugar Board and SRA Administrator then served as the Administrator of SRA under the Chairmanship of Secretary Senen C. Bacani. On February 8, 1992, Administrator Yulo resigned and he was replaced by Atty. Rodolfo A. Gamboa. The position of Board member representing the planters was given to Atty. Vicente Oliva, who served the unexpired term of Atty. Gamboa.

Administrator and CEO
Board Member
(Miller’s Sector)
Board Member
(Planter’s Sector)

The current Administrator and CEO of SRA is Pablo Luis S. Azcona concurrently sits in the Sugar Board with board members, Ma. Mitzi V. Mangwa, representing the millers’ sector and David Andrew L. Sanson, representing the planters’ sector, under the chairmanship of the Department of Agriculture Secretary, President FERDINAND “Bongbong” R. MARCOS, Jr.

A chronology of laws and statutes which charted the significant events of the sugar industry is presented here under.

The Philippine sugar industry has sailed through rough and better times. During adverse circumstances, the industry has always been victorious. In these critical times, one note of optimism pervading the industry is that “when one reaches the bottom, there is no other way but up





President FERDINAND “Bongbong” R. MARCOS, Jr. 
President of the Philippines / DA Secretary
DA Facebook
(632) 8928-8741 to 64 / (632) 8273-2474


Administrator and CEO
(632) 8926-2928 / (632) 8929-3633


Board Member – Planter’s Representative


Board Member – Miller’s Representative

Deputy Administrators

Deputy Administrators



Deputy Administrator for Administration and Finance





Deputy Administrator for Research, Development and Extension Department





Deputy Administrator for Regulations

(632)8926-4493/ (632)8929-9223


Office of the Administrator

Office of the Administrator


Atty. Rodney K. Rubica Board Secretary



Jay Andrew T. Adrias Department Manager III, Internal Audit Department (632)8929-6131
Sarah Jean P. Clemente Internal Auditor V, Operations Audit Division (632)8929-6131



Atty. Ronald E. Rimando Department Manager III, Legal Department (632)8236-0063 / (6334)434-8760 / (6334)435-3759



Digna D. Gonzales Department Manager III, Planning, Policy and Special Projects Department (632)8929-6137/ (632)3455-0446
Digna D. Gonzales OIC – Planning Policy and Programming Division (632)3455-4521
Anne Kristine E. Dilay Planning Officer IV, Planning and Policy Research Section (632)3455-0446
Max Edward C. Isada Information Technology II, MIS Section (632)3455-4521
Special Projects, Project Development, Evaluation and Monitoring Division (632)3455-0446


Administrative and Finance Department

Administrative and Finance Department


Atty. Brando D. Noroña Deputy Administrator for Administration and Finance (632)8929-7187

(Luzon and Mindanao Area)

Marco D. Soriano OIC – Department Manager III, Administrative & Finance Department (632)8926-6471/ (632)3455-7656
Narciso R. Cabalquinto, Jr OIC – General Administrative Division (632)3455-3524
Concepcion C. Ruby OIC – Human Resource and Records Section (632)3455-3524
Hazel Rose B. Mariano Supply Officer III, Property/ Procurement/ Bldg and Transport Maintenance Section (632)3455-3524
Erlinda J. Abacan, CPA Chief Accountant, Accounting Division (632)3455-2336
Resty D. Reano, CPA OIC – Budget and Treasury Division (632)8236-0009

(Visayas Area)

Atty. Johana S. Jadoc Department Manager III, Administrative and Finance Department (6334)435-3557
Engr. Dorothy B. Rodgrigo General Administrative Division (6334)435-3557
Felicidad B. Lopez OIC – Finance Division (6334)435-3557
Maria Liza E. Remada OIC – Accounting Section (6334)435-3557
Helen P. Balo OIC – Budget and Treasury Section (6334)435-3557
Lucille Mae M. Sy OIC – Human Resource & Records Section (6334)435-3557
Noli T. Tingson OIC – Property/ Procurement/ Bldg and Transport Maintenance Section (6334)435-3557


Regulation Department

Regulation Department


Atty. Guillermo C. Tejida, III Deputy Administrator for Regulations (632)8926-4493/ (632)8929-9223

(Luzon and Mindanao Area)

Department Manager III, Regulation Department (632)8926-4493/ (632)8929-9223
Ian A. Pedalizo
Chief Sugar Production and Regulation Officer, Sugar Transaction Division (632)3455-7592/ (632)8926-4493
Elsa R. Manangan Chief Sugar Production and Regulation Officer, Licensing & Monitoring Division (632)3455-8340
Arnulfo L. Jacobe Chief Sugar Production and Regulation Officer, Sugar Regulation & Enforcement Division (632)3455-0793
Jean Nanette C. Sumagaysay Chemist V, Laboratory Services (632)3455-8615

(Visayas Area)

Wilfredo R. Monares Department Manager III, Regulation Department (6334)434-1470 / (034)-435-3755 / (034)-435-3139
Locelle T. Roquillas OIC – Licensing and Monitoring Division (6334)434-1470
Engr. Normel L. Fajarito Chief Sugar Production and Regulation Officer, Sugar Regulation and Enforcement Division (6334)434-1470
Janet C. Dilag Chemist V, Laboratory Services Division (6334)434-1470

Research Development and Extension Department

Research Development and Extension Department



Atty. Ignacio S. Santillana Deputy Administrator for Research, Development and Extension Department (632)3455-8615

(Luzon and Mindanao Area)

Engr. Laverne C. Olalia
Department Manager III, Research Development and Extension Department (632)8236-0001
Rosaline R. Agosto Chief Science Research Specialist, Factory Services and Research Division (632)8236-0025
Dr. Marietta Dina Padilla-Fernandez Chief Agriculturist, Extension Services Division (632)8929-6135
Maria Vina A. Serrano Chief Science Research Specialist, Agricultural Support Services Division (6345)970-0795
Raphael Henri B. Mundo Chief Science Research Specialist, Agro-Allied Research Division (6345)970-0795

(Visayas Area)

Helen B. Lobaton Department Manager III – Research, Development & Extension Department (6334)433-6887
Ma. Lourdes Almodiente Chief Agriculturist, Extension and Technical Services Division (6334)433-6887 / (6334)713-2147
Virgie Celestial Chief Science Research Specialist, Research and Laboratory Division (6334)735-0141
Teresita B. Bañas Chief Science Research Specialist, Agricultural Support Services Division (6334)702-9031




Arsenio B Yulo
June 2, 1986 – February 6, 1992
Rodolfo A. Gamboa
February 7, 1992 – January 26, 1996
Rolleo L. Ignacio
January 29, 1996 – August 11, 1996
Wilson P. Gamboa
Aug. 12, 1996 – Nov. 30, 1997
Michael K. Suarez
December 30, 1997 – June 30, 1998
Nicolas A. Alonso
July 6, 1998 – March 4, 2001
James C. Ledesma
March 5, 2001 – August 31, 2007
Rafael L. Coscolluela
Sept. 1, 2007 –  March 2, 2010
Bernardo C. Trebol
March 5, 2010 – July 31, 2010
Ma. Regina Bautista-Martin
August 17, 2010 – Nov 20, 2016
Anna Rosario V. Paner
November 21, 2016 – Sept  20, 2017
Hermenegildo R. Serafica
September 25, 2017 – August 16, 2022
David John Thaddeus P. Alba
August 19, 2022 – April 15, 2023
Pablo Luis S. Azcona
April 20, 2023 – to present